13.2: Distribution of V/Q (2024)

  1. Last updated
  2. Save as PDF
  • Page ID
    34588
  • \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    ( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}} % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}} % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{#1}}} \)

    \(\newcommand{\avec}{\mathbf a}\) \(\newcommand{\bvec}{\mathbf b}\) \(\newcommand{\cvec}{\mathbf c}\) \(\newcommand{\dvec}{\mathbf d}\) \(\newcommand{\dtil}{\widetilde{\mathbf d}}\) \(\newcommand{\evec}{\mathbf e}\) \(\newcommand{\fvec}{\mathbf f}\) \(\newcommand{\nvec}{\mathbf n}\) \(\newcommand{\pvec}{\mathbf p}\) \(\newcommand{\qvec}{\mathbf q}\) \(\newcommand{\svec}{\mathbf s}\) \(\newcommand{\tvec}{\mathbf t}\) \(\newcommand{\uvec}{\mathbf u}\) \(\newcommand{\vvec}{\mathbf v}\) \(\newcommand{\wvec}{\mathbf w}\) \(\newcommand{\xvec}{\mathbf x}\) \(\newcommand{\yvec}{\mathbf y}\) \(\newcommand{\zvec}{\mathbf z}\) \(\newcommand{\rvec}{\mathbf r}\) \(\newcommand{\mvec}{\mathbf m}\) \(\newcommand{\zerovec}{\mathbf 0}\) \(\newcommand{\onevec}{\mathbf 1}\) \(\newcommand{\real}{\mathbb R}\) \(\newcommand{\twovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\ctwovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\threevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cthreevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\mattwo}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{rr}#1 \amp #2 \\ #3 \amp #4 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\laspan}[1]{\text{Span}\{#1\}}\) \(\newcommand{\bcal}{\cal B}\) \(\newcommand{\ccal}{\cal C}\) \(\newcommand{\scal}{\cal S}\) \(\newcommand{\wcal}{\cal W}\) \(\newcommand{\ecal}{\cal E}\) \(\newcommand{\coords}[2]{\left\{#1\right\}_{#2}}\) \(\newcommand{\gray}[1]{\color{gray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\lgray}[1]{\color{lightgray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\rank}{\operatorname{rank}}\) \(\newcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\col}{\text{Col}}\) \(\renewcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\nul}{\text{Nul}}\) \(\newcommand{\var}{\text{Var}}\) \(\newcommand{\corr}{\text{corr}}\) \(\newcommand{\len}[1]{\left|#1\right|}\) \(\newcommand{\bbar}{\overline{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bhat}{\widehat{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bperp}{\bvec^\perp}\) \(\newcommand{\xhat}{\widehat{\xvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\vhat}{\widehat{\vvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\uhat}{\widehat{\uvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\what}{\widehat{\wvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\Sighat}{\widehat{\Sigma}}\) \(\newcommand{\lt}{<}\) \(\newcommand{\gt}{>}\) \(\newcommand{\amp}{&}\) \(\definecolor{fillinmathshade}{gray}{0.9}\)

    As you should understand, ventilation increases down the lung so is greatest at the base, and perfusion follows the same pattern—all due to the effects of gravity. But the increase in ventilation down the lung structure is not equal to the increase in perfusion, as can be seen in figure 13.6. You can see here that perfusion is higher than ventilation at the base; it falls off much more rapidly as the lung is ascended, so it ends up being lower than ventilation at the apex.

    13.2: Distribution of V/Q (2)

    This means there is a range of ventilation–perfusion ratios up the height of the lung (figure 13.6, maroon plot). At the base perfusion is higher than ventilation, so V/Q is less than 1, while toward the apex V/Q rises and becomes greater than 1. At about the level of the third rib, V/Q is perfect (yay!) as ventilation and perfusion are matched, seen here at the points the lines cross. This range of V/Q results in the previously mentioned whole lung average of 0.8.

    As you should appreciate from understanding the ventilation–perfusion line, this range of V/Q across the lung results in a range of alveolar gas partial pressures across the lung. The apical alveoli, being relatively overventilated (or underperfused, whichever way you would like to think about it), have a high V/Q and consequently have partial pressures closer to atmospheric partial pressures. On the other extreme, the basal alveoli are relatively underventilated (or overperfused, your choice) and so have a low V/Q, tending toward zero; thus their partial pressures are closer to venous values (figure 13.7).

    13.2: Distribution of V/Q (3)

    In between these two extremes is a progressive range, so what we see is that alveolar PO2 declines down the lung while alveolar PCO2 rises. As you might imagine, having a range of alveolar gas tensions down the lung has ramifications for gas exchange and particularly for oxygen saturation. This inequality in V/Q resulting in differences in alveolar PO2 is substantial enough to suppress arterial oxygen saturation—and contribute to your oxygen saturation meter never reading 100 percent. Let us see why.

    The difference in alveolar PO2 from apex to base is as high as 40 mmHg, as is reflected in this figure. The apical alveoli have a high PO2 (shown in figure 13.8 as 132 mmHg), primarily due to their poor perfusion and relatively high ventilation and thus high V/Q. This produces a high diffusion gradient from 132 mmHg in the apical alveoli, to 40 mmHg in the apical blood. Consequently, what blood does go to the apex becomes fully saturated before it heads back toward the left heart.

    13.2: Distribution of V/Q (4)

    Down at the base, however, V/Q is low because of the high perfusion and relatively low ventilation. Consequently the PO2 in basal alveoli tend toward venous values, shown in figure 13.8 as 89 mmHg. This lower alveolar PO2 means a diminished diffusion gradient (from 89 in the alveoli to 40 mmHg in the blood), and combined with a shift down the hemoglobin saturation curve (more on this later), this means blood leaving the basal alveoli may not be completely saturated with oxygen.

    When the blood from the apex and base mix on their journey back to the left heart, the outcome is that the combined oxygen saturation is less than 100 percent, about 97 percent. It is worth making perhaps an obvious but critical point here. The blood from the apex is exposed to a substantially higher PO2 and becomes 100 percent saturated (i.e., it cannot take on any more O2 as it is at its full oxygen carrying capacity). There is no way that it can pick up extra to compensate for the blood coming from basal alveoli, which are not at capacity.

    The same is not true for CO2 though. Because of its high solubility, CO2 transport does not rely on a transporter protein like hemoglobin; the transfer of CO2 is really dependent on the diffusion gradient present. So at the apex the lower alveolar PCO2 (slightly less than 30 mmHg looking at our V/Q line) generates a larger diffusion gradient with venous blood, and more CO2 is transferred out the blood, meaning that it can compensate for the low diffusion gradient (perhaps only a few mmHg) that occurs between the alveoli and blood at the lung’s base.

    As a study exercise it may be worthwhile for you to go back to the ventilation–perfusion line and calculate the diffusion gradients for oxygen and carbon dioxide between the alveoli and venous blood at different heights in the lung. I urge you to come to grips with this concept as it is highly pertinent to respiratory disease and can explain clinical-related changes in blood gases.

    The take-home message, however, is that even the normal lung is not perfect and has an average V/Q ratio of 0.8, rather than the ideal of 1, and this slight matching of ventilation and perfusion contributes to the arterial saturation being slightly less than 100 percent, but has little effect on arterial CO2. If respiratory disease increases the mismatch, this effect on oxygen saturation can become more pronounced, but the lung has a defense mechanism for this.

    Correcting V/Q Mismatches

    In an attempt to maintain V/Q close to 1 and prevent V/Q mismatching, the pulmonary vasculature has an unusual response to hypoxia. While the systemic vasculature responds to local hypoxia with a vasodilation to bring more blood to the area, the pulmonary vasculature constricts in the presence of low oxygen to shunt blood away from hypoxic regions.

    Let us look at a common scenario that might occur in a patient with chronic bronchitis. Figure 13.9 represents two regions of the lung. One region becomes blocked by a mucus plug, and ventilation to that region goes to zero.

    13.2: Distribution of V/Q (5)

    The alveolar partial pressures will rapidly equilibrate to venous pressures, and desaturated blood goes back to the left heart from this region while the local region around this area becomes mildly hypoxic. The pulmonary vasculature responds to the hypoxia by vasoconstricting, reducing the perfusion to the unventilated region and helping to rematch the V/Q ratio in this region (i.e., low ventilation is matched with low perfusion). In common sense terms, there is no point sending pulmonary blood to an unventilated region, so the hypoxia-driven vasoconstriction prevents this from happening.

    The distensibility of the pulmonary vasculature means that the blood is shunted to unconstricted vessels (i.e., those supplying ventilated regions). Thus the lung has its own inherent mechanism to optimize V/Q and promote the most effective gas exchange possible.

    The unusual response of the pulmonary vasculature is demonstrated in figure 13.10, showing how as alveolar PO2 falls (as occurs with a decline in alveolar ventilation) then blood flow falls—and likewise, the more oxygen in the alveolus, the more pulmonary perfusion it receives.

    13.2: Distribution of V/Q (6)

    This effect is driven by a hypoxia-sensitive potassium channel found on the albeit sparse smooth muscle of the pulmonary arterioles. This channel is normally open and allows the exit of potassium, which in turn keeps the inside of the muscle cell polarized. When exposed to hypoxia the channel closes, and the outward potassium current stops, allowing the muscle cell’s membrane potential to rise and consequently depolarize to cause a contraction.

    Summary

    So to summarize, the ratio of ventilation and perfusion changes across the lung, and this affects the alveolar and consequently arterial gas tensions from those regions. While the lung does not reach the ideal V/Q ratio, it is capable of shunting pulmonary blood flow away from unventilated areas to optimize gas exchange.

    References, Resources, and Further Reading

    Text

    Levitsky, Michael G. "Chapter 5: Ventilation–Perfusion Relationships." In Pulmonary Physiology, 9th ed. New York: McGraw Hill Education, 2018.

    West, John B. "Chapter 5: Ventilation–Perfusion Relationships—How Matching of Gas and Blood Determines Gas Exchange." In Respiratory Physiology: The Essentials, 9th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2012.

    Widdicombe, John G., and Andrew S. Davis. "Chapter 7." In Respiratory Physiology. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1983.

    Figures

    13.2: Distribution of V/Q (2024)

    FAQs

    What is the normal V/Q ratio of the lungs? ›

    A normal Q (perfusion)value is around 5 L /minute. Therefore, the Normal V/Q ratio is 4/5 or 0.8. When the V/Q is > 0.8, it means ventilation exceeds perfusion. Blood clots, heart failure, emphysema, or damage to the pulmonary capillaries may cause this.

    What is the v/q ratio in pulmonary embolism? ›

    A pulmonary embolism can result in reduced perfusion of the lungs. Obstruction of some regions of pulmonary circulation limits blood flow to alveoli. As a result, blood is redirected to other areas of the lung. As the other areas receive an increased blood supply, the V/Q ratio will be <1.

    What is a high V Q mismatch? ›

    An increased V/Q ratio occurs when there is decreased perfusion in the lungs. Even with normal airflow or minimally impaired airflow, you could develop a V/Q mismatch in which the perfusion is low with nearly normal ventilation. This can occur due to disease or blockage of the blood vessels in the lungs.

    How to calculate VQ ratio? ›

    Normal V (ventilation) is 4 L of air per minute. Normal Q (perfusion) is 5L of blood per minute. So Normal V/Q ratio is 4/5 or 0.8.

    What is VQ ratio in respiratory failure? ›

    V/Q ratio is defined as the ratio of the amount of air reaching the alveoli per minute to the amount of blood reaching the alveoli per minute. These two variables, V & Q, constitute the main determinants of the blood oxygen (O2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration.

    What lung ratio is COPD? ›

    According to the GOLD guidelines, COPD is typically diagnosed based on restricted airflow indicated by an FEV1/FVC ratio < 0.7. However, PRISm represents a distinct pulmonary function state characterised by a proportional decline in both FEV1 and FVC, maintaining the FEV1/FVC ratio within the normal range.

    What are the normal results of a lung perfusion scan? ›

    A normal pulmonary perfusion scan has no perfusion defects or perfusion exactly outlines the shape of the lungs seen on the chest radiograph.

    How do you score a pulmonary embolism? ›

    Wells scores (Table 1) of 0-2 are considered low PE probability (<3.6% risk of PE). Scores of 3-6 points are considered moderate PE probability (<20.5% risk of PE) and scores of 6 points or greater indicate a high probability for PE (up to 66.7% risk of PE).

    What is the scale for pulmonary embolism? ›

    ≤ 65: Class I, Very Low Risk. 66-85: Class II, Low Risk. 86-105: Class III, Intermediate Risk. 106-125: Class IV, High Risk.

    Is emphysema high or low vq? ›

    A high V/Q can also be observed in emphysema as a maladaptive ventilatory overwork of the undamaged lung parenchyma. Because of the loss of alveolar surface area, there is proportionally more ventilation per available perfusion area.

    What do the results of a VQ scan mean? ›

    What do the results of a VQ scan mean? If the results of your VQ scan are abnormal, it means something is preventing your lungs from working properly. If the sets of pictures from the two parts of the scan don't match, it could mean you have a pulmonary embolism (PE).

    What is type 1 respiratory failure? ›

    Type 1 respiratory failure is a lack of oxygen alone. It may be caused by any long-term condition causing damage to the lungs (for example Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease or bronchiectasis). If the problem is simply a lack of oxygen, then treatment with oxygen alone may be sufficient.

    How to improve v q mismatch? ›

    V/Q mismatch treatment options
    1. Bronchodilators. Bronchodilators are a type of medication to improve breathing. ...
    2. Inhaled corticosteroids. Your doctor might prescribe an inhaled steroid to help improve lung function. ...
    3. Oxygen therapy. ...
    4. Oral steroids. ...
    5. Antibiotics. ...
    6. Pulmonary rehabilitation therapy. ...
    7. Blood thinners. ...
    8. Surgery.
    Oct 26, 2018

    How does exercise affect the VQ ratio? ›

    In normal subjects, exercise widens the alveolar-arterial PO2 difference (P[A-a]O2) despite a more uniform topographic distribution of ventilation-perfusion ( V ˙ A / Q ˙ ) ratios.

    What is Type 1 respiratory failure V Q mismatch? ›

    Type 1 respiratory failure involves hypoxaemia (PaO2 <8 kPa / 60mmHg) with normocapnia (PaCO2 <6.0 kPa / 45mmHg). It usually occurs due to ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) mismatch – the volume of air flowing in and out of the lungs is not matched with the flow of blood to the lung tissue.

    What is a normal lung expansion ratio? ›

    The normal value is about 6,000mL(4‐6 L). TLC is calculated by summation of the four primary lung volumes (TV, IRV, ERV, RV). TLC may be increased in patients with obstructive defects such as emphysema and decreased in patients with restrictive abnormalities including chest wall abnormalities and kyphoscoliosis.

    What is a normal VQ scan for ventilation? ›

    A normal ventilation scan (even distribution of radionuclide throughout the lung fields) with multiple, bilateral perfusion defects are the classical findings of pulmonary embolism 1. Perfusion defects will be present in regions of acute or chronic airway obstruction due to reflex vasoconstriction in the same region.

    What is a good lung heart ratio? ›

    The mean lung/heart ratio on an anterior planar image was 0.40 for all patients; therefore <0.40 was arbitrarily defined as normal.

    What is normal lung volume results? ›

    FEV1, Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second

    Average values in healthy patients aged 20-60 range from 4.5 to 3.5 liters in males and from 3.25 to 2.5 liters in females.

    Top Articles
    Very Peanut Butter Cookies - Sally's Baking Addiction
    Protein Mug Cake
    Funny Roblox Id Codes 2023
    Great Clips Mount Airy Nc
    Fan Van Ari Alectra
    Maria Dolores Franziska Kolowrat Krakowská
    Missed Connections Inland Empire
    Katmoie
    Aadya Bazaar
    30 Insanely Useful Websites You Probably Don't Know About
    Txtvrfy Sheridan Wy
    Snarky Tea Net Worth 2022
    Tabler Oklahoma
    Culos Grandes Ricos
    Walmart Windshield Wiper Blades
    Guidewheel lands $9M Series A-1 for SaaS that boosts manufacturing and trims carbon emissions | TechCrunch
    National Office Liquidators Llc
    Tvtv.us Duluth Mn
    Golden Abyss - Chapter 5 - Lunar_Angel
    Vrachtwagens in Nederland kopen - gebruikt en nieuw - TrucksNL
    Saritaprivate
    Samantha Aufderheide
    Walmart Pharmacy Near Me Open
    Top 20 scariest Roblox games
    Weather October 15
    John Philip Sousa Foundation
    Google Flights To Orlando
    County Cricket Championship, day one - scores, radio commentary & live text
    Inmate Search Disclaimer – Sheriff
    Delta Rastrear Vuelo
    Ellafeet.official
    Amici Pizza Los Alamitos
    Navigating change - the workplace of tomorrow - key takeaways
    Goodwill Houston Select Stores Photos
    11 Pm Pst
    Closest 24 Hour Walmart
    Why Holly Gibney Is One of TV's Best Protagonists
    Watchseries To New Domain
    Jail View Sumter
    Paperless Employee/Kiewit Pay Statements
    Craigslist Tulsa Ok Farm And Garden
    What Is Kik and Why Do Teenagers Love It?
    Final Fantasy 7 Remake Nexus
    Discover Wisconsin Season 16
    Luciane Buchanan Bio, Wiki, Age, Husband, Net Worth, Actress
    Sofia Franklyn Leaks
    Yourcuteelena
    Dineren en overnachten in Boutique Hotel The Church in Arnhem - Priya Loves Food & Travel
    Is Chanel West Coast Pregnant Due Date
    Erica Mena Net Worth Forbes
    Round Yellow Adderall
    Arre St Wv Srj
    Latest Posts
    Article information

    Author: Mr. See Jast

    Last Updated:

    Views: 6357

    Rating: 4.4 / 5 (75 voted)

    Reviews: 82% of readers found this page helpful

    Author information

    Name: Mr. See Jast

    Birthday: 1999-07-30

    Address: 8409 Megan Mountain, New Mathew, MT 44997-8193

    Phone: +5023589614038

    Job: Chief Executive

    Hobby: Leather crafting, Flag Football, Candle making, Flying, Poi, Gunsmithing, Swimming

    Introduction: My name is Mr. See Jast, I am a open, jolly, gorgeous, courageous, inexpensive, friendly, homely person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.