Disclaimer: The TipRanks Smart Score performance is based on backtested results. Backtested performance is not an indicator of future actual results. The results reflect performance of a strategy not historically offered to investors and does not represent returns that any investor actually attained. Backtested results are calculated by the retroactive application of a model constructed on the basis of historical data and based on assumptions integral to the model which may or may not be testable and are subject to losses. General assumptions include: XYZ firm would have been able to purchase the securities recommended by the model and the markets were sufficiently liquid to permit all trading. Changes in these assumptions may have a material impact on the backtested returns presented. Certain assumptions have been made for modeling purposes and are unlikely to be realized. No representations and warranties are made as to the reasonableness of the assumptions. This information is provided for illustrative purposes only. Backtested performance is developed with the benefit of hindsight and has inherent limitations. Specifically, backtested results do not reflect actual trading or the effect of material economic and market factors on the decision-making process. Since trades have not actually been executed, results may have under- or over-compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity, and may not reflect the impact that certain economic or market factors may have had on the decision-making process. Further, backtesting allows the security selection methodology to be adjusted until past returns are maximized. Actual performance may differ significantly from backtested performance. Backtested results are adjusted to reflect the reinvestment of dividends and other income and, except where otherwise indicated, are presented gross-of fees and do not include the effect of backtested transaction costs, management fees, performance fees or expenses, if applicable. Please note all regulatory considerations regarding the presentation of fees must be taken into account. No cash balance or cash flow is included in the calculation.
FAQs
Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) Stock Forecast, Price Targets & Predictions - TipRanks.com? ›
VUG 12 Month Forecast
What are the top 10 stocks in VUG? ›- NVIDIA Corporation 10.91%
- Amazon.com, Inc. 4.88%
- Meta Platforms, Inc. 4.16%
- Alphabet Inc. 4.02%
- Alphabet Inc. 3.30%
- Eli Lilly and Company 2.75%
- Tesla, Inc. 2.52%
- Visa Inc. 1.63%
Average Return
In the past year, VOO returned a total of 24.20%, which is lower than VUG's 26.50% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has had annualized average returns of 12.66% , compared to 14.71% for VUG. These numbers are adjusted for stock splits and include dividends.
| Month-end | 10-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| VUG (Market price) 1 | 2.25% | 15.06% |
| VUG (NAV) | 2.27% | 15.06% |
| Benchmark 2 | 2.28% | 15.10% |
Average Price Target
Based on 506 Wall Street analysts offering 12 month price targets to VOO holdings in the last 3 months. The average price target is $575.40 with a high forecast of $670.37 and a low forecast of $470.96. The average price target represents a 15.86% change from the last price of $496.64.
VUG has a consensus rating of Strong Buy which is based on 163 buy ratings, 26 hold ratings and 1 sell ratings. What is VUG's price target? The average price target for VUG is $430.74. This is based on 190 Wall Streets Analysts 12-month price targets, issued in the past 3 months.
What are the top 5 ETFs to buy? ›| ETF | Assets Under Management | Expense Ratio |
|---|---|---|
| iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (ticker: IBIT) | $22.6 billion | 0.12% |
| Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) | $470 million | 0.50% |
| iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) | $566 million | 0.39% |
| iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) | $610 million | 0.39% |
QQQ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%, versus 0.04% for VUG. QQQ is up 20.05% year-to-date (YTD) with +$22.16B in YTD flows. VUG performs better with 23.54% YTD performance, and +$8.42B in YTD flows.
Should I invest in VTI or VUG? ›VUG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.04%, versus 0.03% for VTI. VUG is up 23.54% year-to-date (YTD) with +$8.42B in YTD flows. VTI performs worse with 17.53% YTD performance, and +$17.63B in YTD flows.
What is the best growth ETF? ›- Vanguard Growth ETF. VUG | ETF. ...
- iShares Morningstar Growth ETF. ILCG | ETF. ...
- iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF. IUSG | ETF. ...
- Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF. FDMO | ETF. ...
- JPMorgan US Momentum Factor ETF. JMOM | ETF. ...
- Direxion NASDAQ-100® Equal Wtd ETF. QQQE | ETF. ...
- Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF. VOOG | ETF. ...
- Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF. QQQM | ETF. #10.
Does VUG pay a dividend? ›
VUG has a dividend yield of 0.52% and paid $1.88 per share in the past year. The dividend is paid every three months and the last ex-dividend date was Jun 27, 2024.
Which is better, VUG or VGT? ›VUG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.04%, versus 0.1% for VGT. VUG is up 23.54% year-to-date (YTD) with +$8.42B in YTD flows. VGT performs better with 24.1% YTD performance, and +$4.44B in YTD flows.
How many stocks does VUG hold? ›VUG has a total of 190 holdings.
What is the fastest growing ETF Vanguard? ›| Symbol Symbol | ETF Name ETF Name | 1 Year 1 Year |
|---|---|---|
| MGK | Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 28.21% |
| VONG | Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 27.54% |
| VBK | Vanguard Small Cap Growth ETF | 11.34% |
| VOT | Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 13.14% |
As of June 2024, the Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index provided the highest one-year return rate. The Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund ranked second having a one-year return rate of 36.3 percent.
What are the top 3 holdings of the Vanguard 500 Index Fund? ›- Apple Inc. 6.90%
- Microsoft Corporation 6.70%
- NVIDIA Corporation 6.20%
- Amazon.com, Inc. 3.69%
- Meta Platforms, Inc. 2.24%
- Alphabet Inc. 2.17%
- Alphabet Inc. 1.82%
- Berkshire Hathaway Inc. 1.71%
- Apple Inc. 12.89% $32.04B. ― $3.36T. 23.93% ...
- MSFT. Microsoft. 12.39% $30.79B. ― ...
- Nvidia Corporation. 10.90% $27.08B. ― $2.52T. ...
- AMZN. Amazon.Com, Inc. 4.88% $12.11B. ― ...
- META. Meta Platforms, Inc. 4.15% $10.32B. ― ...
- GOOGL. Alphabet Inc. Class A. 4.02% $9.98B. ...
- GOOG. Alphabet Inc. Class C. 3.30% $8.19B. ...
- LLY. Eli Lilly And Company. 2.75% $6.83B. ―
QQQ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%, versus 0.04% for VUG. QQQ is up 20.05% year-to-date (YTD) with +$22.16B in YTD flows. VUG performs better with 23.54% YTD performance, and +$8.42B in YTD flows.
What are the holdings in VUG? ›| No. | Symbol | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | AAPL | 12.90% |
| 2 | MSFT | 12.40% |
| 3 | NVDA | 10.91% |
| 4 | AMZN | 4.88% |
| Symbol Symbol | ETF Name ETF Name | % In Top 10 % In Top 10 |
|---|---|---|
| MGK | Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 62.95% |
| VONG | Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 59.83% |
| VBK | Vanguard Small Cap Growth ETF | 8.96% |
| VOT | Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 17.21% |