Meta | Title | The Difference Between Counting Calories vs Macros | Goodlife (2024)

Both calorie- and macro-counting are tools used to manage your food and energy intake across the day, often with the aim of helping you lose, gain or maintain weight. Both require tracking your food intake, usually with an app like MyFitnessPal, to count the number of calories or macros you’re eating throughout the day.

Each time you eat or drink something, you simply log it in your app or software, and you’ll be able to see the calorie or macro breakdown of whatever you’ve consumed. While both methods of tracking are slightly different, they both require a lot of effort and work. Most of the time, you need to weigh or measure all your food before eating, so you can track your intake accurately, in addition to inputting everything you eat into your tracking tools.

What’s the difference between the two?

Calorie counting basically gives you a set number of calories to eat each day, taking into account your height, age, weight, level of physical activity, and your weight goals.

Calories are simply a unit of measurement for energy, so using this method means your food is measured purely by the energy it contains. Each macronutrient (protein, carbs and fats) contains a different number of calories - fat contains 9 calories/gram, while protein and carbs contain 4 calories/gram, so the idea is that you can eat whatever you want within your allocated calories for the day.

On the other hand, macro counting focuses more on the macronutrient profiles (again, carbohydrates, fats and protein) of foods you eat throughout the day. Rather than counting calories, you track how many grams of each macronutrient you’re eating. Indirectly, you’re still tracking calories since macronutrients make up the calories in the food and drink you consume, yet macro tracking allows you to manipulate your diet to prioritise the macronutrients you thrive and feel your best on. For example, a keto diet requires macro tracking to achieve ketosis, as you need to limit your carbohydrate intake and maximise your fat intake, meaning you need to actively analyse each meal’s macro profile.

So which is more effective?

Macro tracking can be more effective in helping you achieve weight-related goals and health goals, as it places more emphasis on what you’re eating, rather than the specific focus calorie counting places on how much energy you’re consuming. Macro tracking also takes into account your nutrient intake to some extent, while calorie counting takes no account of nutrients.

By manipulating different macronutrient intakes, you can more directly impact your health and weight outcomes. For example, high protein diets have been shown to help grow lean muscle mass, as well as leaving you more satiated throughout the day (and therefore less likely to overeat). Knowing this, you can choose to increase your macros allocated to protein, in order to help you achieve your goals. So arguably this is the more accurate, effective method to use.

However, in saying that, both calorie- and macro-counting can be misleading if you fall into the trap of IIFYM (If It Fits Your Macros). Basically, if you adopt the mindset that you can eat whatever you want as long as it fits into your allocated calorie or macro target for the day, no matter how high in saturated fats, sugars, artificial additives etc, it is, you might suffer from adverse health outcomes.

Because, despite all we hear about weight loss requiring a calorie deficit, and calories in vs calories out being the bottom line for achieving all your goals, it’s not quite this simple… The reality is this: all foods are not equal. Eating one greasy, artificial burger each day because it fits your calories or macros, versus eating a variety of different plant foods, vegetables, fruits, wholegrains, healthy fats and proteins, has a hugely different impact on your health.

Why? Well, because health isn’t just about your weight! So focusing too much on the numbers side of things can lead to nutrient deficiencies, and poor health outcomes and concerns if you’re not eating enough nutrient-dense foods. So while we can say macro-counting may be the lesser of two evils, it’s not enough to purely focus on your macronutrient intake, and ignore the healthfulness of everything you’re putting into your body.

Should you start tracking?

Interestingly, research shows us that people who track both calories and macros tend to give it up over time, as it can really take the joy out of food. Sometimes tracking becomes so consuming, you forget about choosing foods you actually enjoy, simply focusing on the macro profile or calories they contain instead. This can rob you of the social connections eating can offer, as well as the joy of eating your favourite foods! We’re definitely not about that…

Also, if you’ve ever struggled with disordered eating or unhealthy behaviours around food, this is probably not the way to go for you… Tracking can create a really obsessive, disordered relationship with food, and we know it can really exacerbate issues like these. If you see food as simply numbers to control and restrict, you can all too easily fall down the rabbit hole of disordered eating. And it can be very hard to climb back out of that hole!

If you find yourself becoming obsessive about eating the “perfect” diet, or unable to enjoy a meal out with friends, or even feel like you’re chained to your MyFitnessPal app, maybe it’s time to rethink your tracking habits… There is a point at which obsessing over being “healthy” can actually become incredibly unhealthy.

Interestingly, both calorie and macro tracking are both notoriously inaccurate and unreliable, with most people either understating or overstating their food consumption significantly throughout the day. This can lead to even worse health outcomes, with many people undereating as a result. Others end up cutting out entire food groups with the aim of being “healthier”, with no need to do so whatsoever!

The other thing to note is this: less can be more when it comes to calorie deficits for weight loss. The idea of tracking sometimes makes us believe that the greater the calorie deficit you’re in, the faster you’ll achieve your weight loss goals… but this isn’t the case! In fact, if your calorie deficit is too large, your body will panic and go into “starvation mode”, actively storing fat because it believes it may not be fed enough in the future. So an excessive deficit can slow down your weight loss efforts, and be incredibly unsustainable over time. Again we see, tracking is not the golden ticket to reaching your goals!

However, if you’re trying to gain weight or muscle, tracking may have some use. Particularly when focusing on building muscle, by significantly increasing your protein intake (and overall calories), you give yourself a much greater chance of achieving this goal - so in this instance, tracking may be helpful. But keep in mind, macro and calorie-counting should only ever be used as a short-term tool - it should never become a lifestyle!

The bottom line?

No scientific research currently supports the idea that tracking macros or calories is more effective than the other in helping you achieve weight-related goals. Even looking into the difference between low-fat versus low-carb diets found no significant differences in results between the two, suggesting that tracking macros might not be hugely helpful. Similarly, calorie tracking was only as effective as it was sustainable.

So it comes down to this: the best way to manage your health and weight, if that’s your focus, is to find a way of eating that is both enjoyable and sustainable, and feels more like a lifestyle choice than a diet. You don’t need to analyse and track every mouthful of food you swallow - where’s the fun in that?! Instead, remember that every one of us is unique and responds differently to different foods and diets.

So put your focus back onto eating healthy, whole foods the majority of the time, and leaving room for some fun foods to be added into the mix too! Find what works for you and stick to it - because consistency is always key!

Need more nutrition and fitness tips and strategies to help you reach your goals? Head to our blog for heaps of helpful info, healthy recipes, tips and tricks!

Meta | Title | The Difference Between Counting Calories vs Macros | Goodlife (2024)

FAQs

Meta | Title | The Difference Between Counting Calories vs Macros | Goodlife? ›

With calorie counting, you have a set number of calories to eat each day based on your height, weight, age, activity level, and goals. With macro counting, calories are divided between three main macronutrients: protein, carbohydrates, and fat. (Alcohol is also a macronutrient and could be tracked, if desired.)

Is it better to count macros or calories? ›

So which is more effective? Macro tracking can be more effective in helping you achieve weight-related goals and health goals, as it places more emphasis on what you're eating, rather than the specific focus calorie counting places on how much energy you're consuming.

Is it better to count calories or protein? ›

If you want to lose weight, the most important factor is your calorie intake — if you haven't hit your protein target by the end of the day but you've eaten all your calories, all the fitness experts I've spoken to agree it's best not to eat more.

Why do macros not match calories? ›

If you've tracked for a while, you may have noticed that calories don't always line up with macros. Why is that? This is due to rounding on food labels and the ability for food manufacturers to subtract the calories from dietary fiber and sugar alcohols.

What is the difference between macros and calories in out? ›

HOW MACROS AND CALORIES ARE DIFFERENT. Calories refer to the overall energy a food contributes. Counting calories and manipulating intake influences only body weight gain, loss or maintenance. Macros refers to the composition of a food i.e. how much of that food is made up of protein, fat or carbohydrates.

Do macros matter if you hit your calories? ›

Each macronutrient plays a role in keeping your body full and satisfied, which helps to prevent overeating, reduces cravings and enables you to lose weight. "Calories are important for weight loss, but understanding macronutrients will help you stay on track and achieve long-term weight loss," Albert says.

Are macros or calories more important for weight gain? ›

For gaining weight, you may also want to track your macros to make sure that you are getting enough calories per day to support weight gain. Whether you want to gain overall weight or specifically muscle mass, your macro breakdown may look slightly different.

Can you lose weight by counting calories and not macros? ›

In short, yes. You do not have to attach yourself to numbers of every food, count your macros and/or your calories to lose body fat. Here's the crucial component of any successful fat loss diet. You must be in a calorie deficit.

Should I focus more on protein or calories to lose weight? ›

Eating more protein may make it easier to naturally reduce the number of calories you consume while increasing the number of calories you burn. For this reason, it's not surprising that high protein diets lead to weight loss, even without intentional restriction of calories, portions, fat, or carbs.

Should I prioritize calories or protein? ›

Some diet experts believe you're wasting time counting calories or focusing on fat, instead, they say you should aim for 100 or more grams of protein a day. The Dietary Guidelines for Americans suggest women eat about 46 grams and men eat about 56 grams of protein daily.

Are macros or calories more important for building muscle? ›

For body composition goals, like building lean muscle mass, counting macros is more useful. Even without a specific goal in mind, there are benefits to counting macros. Doing so gives you a better idea of the quality of the food you're eating. Counting calories only tells you about quantity, not quality.

What is a good macro ratio for weight loss? ›

Your perfect macronutrient ratio depends on your goals, activity level, age, health, and genetics. For weight loss purposes, a moderate carb (30%-40% of calories), moderate fat (20%-30% of calories), and high protein diet (25%-35% of calories) tends to work for most people.

Is it more effective to count calories or carbs? ›

Eating processed carbohydrates such as white bread, white rice, potato products, and sugar can drive up insulin levels in the body and lead to weight gain.

Should I adjust my macros as I lose weight? ›

Instance #2: You've Lost A Significant Amount Of Weight

Thus you need to re-adjust your macros. Yet, we only suggest doing this if you are no longer making progress or if your energy levels are tanked. Lower energy levels might be a sign of a slowed (temporarily adapted metabolism).

Top Articles
6 Benefits to Using Activated Charcoal on Skin, Teeth, Hair & More
Can Dogs Eat Bell Peppers?
Funny Roblox Id Codes 2023
Golden Abyss - Chapter 5 - Lunar_Angel
Www.paystubportal.com/7-11 Login
Joi Databas
DPhil Research - List of thesis titles
Shs Games 1V1 Lol
Evil Dead Rise Showtimes Near Massena Movieplex
Steamy Afternoon With Handsome Fernando
Which aspects are important in sales |#1 Prospection
Detroit Lions 50 50
18443168434
Zürich Stadion Letzigrund detailed interactive seating plan with seat & row numbers | Sitzplan Saalplan with Sitzplatz & Reihen Nummerierung
Grace Caroline Deepfake
978-0137606801
Nwi Arrests Lake County
Immortal Ink Waxahachie
Craigslist Free Stuff Santa Cruz
Mflwer
Spergo Net Worth 2022
Costco Gas Foster City
Obsidian Guard's Cutlass
Marvon McCray Update: Did He Pass Away Or Is He Still Alive?
Mccain Agportal
Amih Stocktwits
Fort Mccoy Fire Map
Uta Kinesiology Advising
Kcwi Tv Schedule
What Time Does Walmart Auto Center Open
Nesb Routing Number
Random Bibleizer
10 Best Places to Go and Things to Know for a Trip to the Hickory M...
Black Lion Backpack And Glider Voucher
Gopher Carts Pensacola Beach
Duke University Transcript Request
Lincoln Financial Field, section 110, row 4, home of Philadelphia Eagles, Temple Owls, page 1
Jambus - Definition, Beispiele, Merkmale, Wirkung
Netherforged Lavaproof Boots
Ark Unlock All Skins Command
Craigslist Red Wing Mn
D3 Boards
Jail View Sumter
Nancy Pazelt Obituary
Birmingham City Schools Clever Login
Thotsbook Com
Vérificateur De Billet Loto-Québec
Funkin' on the Heights
Vci Classified Paducah
Www Pig11 Net
Ty Glass Sentenced
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Allyn Kozey

Last Updated:

Views: 6227

Rating: 4.2 / 5 (43 voted)

Reviews: 82% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Allyn Kozey

Birthday: 1993-12-21

Address: Suite 454 40343 Larson Union, Port Melia, TX 16164

Phone: +2456904400762

Job: Investor Administrator

Hobby: Sketching, Puzzles, Pet, Mountaineering, Skydiving, Dowsing, Sports

Introduction: My name is Allyn Kozey, I am a outstanding, colorful, adventurous, encouraging, zealous, tender, helpful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.